[Forum Game] [Mafia] Stable Conundrum

A place to discuss any PnP (Pen and Paper) role-playing games you are working on.
Post Reply
User avatar
SourCherry
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 2:57 pm
Location: Finland, Turku

Re: [Forum Game] [Mafia] Stable Conundrum

Post by SourCherry » Sun Aug 03, 2014 2:57 pm

Also, the two scums that have been picking us off would quickly company each other through the buddy system.

User avatar
sophos
Posts: 165
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: [Forum Game] [Mafia] Stable Conundrum

Post by sophos » Sun Aug 03, 2014 7:46 pm

"Well now they wouldn't, or would they?" *sigh* "It seems all we really know is that we don't have anything to go on. We have as much, or less, info as they do. Until something new, and substantial, comes up; we're sitting ducks taking stabs in the dark with dull points at bad metaphors."

User avatar
f1r3w4rr10r
Posts: 629
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 11:26 am
Location: Germany (UTC+1)
Contact:

Re: [Forum Game] [Mafia] Stable Conundrum

Post by f1r3w4rr10r » Mon Aug 04, 2014 9:06 am

"Killed in a place of healing...oh the irony." The zebra shakes his head.

User avatar
Palm
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 4:26 am
Location: Sweden

Re: [Forum Game] [Mafia] Stable Conundrum

Post by Palm » Mon Aug 04, 2014 6:46 pm

There has been call for evidence, and while evidence usually would make sense, right now inaction is our biggest threat. Sophos has been supporting apathy since the very beginning, saying nothing other than we should just sit idly by while the murderer rampage! Why is that?
I made some tokens to be used for virtual tabletops such as roll20, might be of interest if you like a playing field for your games.

User avatar
Schorcht
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: [Forum Game] [Mafia] Stable Conundrum

Post by Schorcht » Mon Aug 04, 2014 6:56 pm

I have to agree. He has been mostly quiet, and really that is the best way to avoid accusation. Some of the things he's said has really raised some flags for me that seem to try to avoid any sort of confrontation. Sophos it is for me.

User avatar
sophos
Posts: 165
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: [Forum Game] [Mafia] Stable Conundrum

Post by sophos » Mon Aug 04, 2014 7:00 pm

sophos raises a brow. "Maybe because at this point, we have better statisical chance to vote out an innocent than an enemy; and hence, would rather not help eliminate another one of us. It would be in the best interest of the Steel Rangers to make as many accusations as possible and, if I remember correctly, you ;Palm; have been the quickest to call judgement."

User avatar
Schorcht
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: [Forum Game] [Mafia] Stable Conundrum

Post by Schorcht » Mon Aug 04, 2014 7:41 pm

Two things. One: SOMEPONY has to act, and it seems really counter productive to turn on who ever does it first. It's a really lame tactic. Two: Abstaining from voting just cause there are more of us is also, counter productive. You would be simply allowing the culprits to kill more themselves. There is, and probably won't be evidence against them. It's best to kick this in the butt as soon as possible.

User avatar
sophos
Posts: 165
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: [Forum Game] [Mafia] Stable Conundrum

Post by sophos » Mon Aug 04, 2014 7:53 pm

(They win when there are less of us than them, it doesn't matter who does the killing. Also, one of us is a "sheriff" that can investigate at night and discover who is part of the scum team; that is, unless we vote them out. Also we don't have to do anything, if we hadn't voted anyone out before we'd be up two innocents. And it isn't as if we didn't know that, all of that was easy to calculate: 9 players, 2 scum = 77.7% chance we run out an innocent. We are just lucky there's still a guard and a sheriff out there. Simple math and logic. Tell me Schorcht, what is it exactly that you base your decisions on?)

User avatar
Schorcht
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 12:55 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: [Forum Game] [Mafia] Stable Conundrum

Post by Schorcht » Mon Aug 04, 2014 8:50 pm

Don't you muddle the issue with fancy mathematics. The issue is you chose not to act, trying to go unnoticed. It's like you care not that someone dies, and will wait to act when you have 'a better mathematic chance'. If we stop them early it will save more lives, and in this case I think it to be you.

User avatar
sophos
Posts: 165
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: [Forum Game] [Mafia] Stable Conundrum

Post by sophos » Mon Aug 04, 2014 9:36 pm

"What do you think happens to those we vote out? Alone in the waste, with only a few personal items; that's a death-sentance. One that I, nor TyrannisUmbra, wished to be part of; four didn't vote at all. And YOU wanna call ME cold!" sophos drew incredibly close to Schorcht, emphatically poking him in the chest from time to time. "And while we're on the subject, YOU'RE A DAMN LIAR! I've spoken more than anypony else here; nearly double that of SourCherry, next most outspoken. If I was trying to lie low, I'D DO JUST THAT!" sophos unleashed copious amounts of saliva along with that last phrase.

Post Reply